Efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody specifically binding tumor necrosis factor-alpha and has been approved for the treatment of several inflammatory disorders. However, the efficacy of infliximab in primary treatment of Kawasaki disease (KD) or retreatment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)-resistant KD in children is controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of infliximab alone or in combination with IVIG to IVIG. Eligible randomized and non-randomized trials were retrieved by searching literature databases prior to May 31, 2023. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for dichotomous variables, and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI was estimated for continuous variables. A total of 14 eligible studies comprising 1257 participants were included. In refractory KD, infliximab alone was associated with a higher effectiveness rate (OR = 4.48, 95% CI 2.67-7.52) and defervescence rate (OR = 5.01, 95% CI 2.99-8.37) and resulted in a 1.08-day-shorter duration of fever (95% CI 0.61-1.55, P < 0.001) and 1.36-day-shorter length of hospital stay (95% CI 0.65-2.08) compared with IVIG. Incidences of coronary artery lesions (CALs), newly developing CALs, and CAL regression did not differ between both groups. For initial treatment of KD, infliximab in addition to IVIG led to a nominally significant higher effectiveness rate (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.02-5.01) and a larger reduction of right coronary artery Z score (MD = -0.24, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.21) but did not show additional efficacy in improving other outcomes. The safety profile was similar between both groups.   Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrates that infliximab alone is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for IVIG-resistant KD. The additional efficacy of infliximab to IVIG for initial treatment of KD is limited. More large and high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of infliximab, especially for intensification of primary treatment for KD. What is Known: • Infliximab is a novel monoclonal antibody specifically blocking tumor necrosis factor-alpha and is approved for treatment of several immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. • The efficacy of infliximab in treating children with Kawasaki disease is controversial. What is New: • Infliximab is an effective and safe treatment for children with refractory Kawasaki disease but adds limited efficacy to intravenous immunoglobulin for initial treatment of Kawasaki disease.

Implementation of a tier system for IVIG indications to address IVIG shortage at a tertiary care pediatric medical center.

BACKGROUND: Drug shortages are a common issue that healthcare systems face and can result in adverse health outcomes for patients requiring inferior alternate treatment. The United States recently experienced a national drug shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Several reported strategies to address the IVIG and other drug shortages have been proposed; however, there is a lack of evidence-based methods for protocol development and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of introducing a multidisciplinary task force and tier system of indications and to minimize adverse effects during a shortage of IVIG. METHODS: Faculty members across disciplines with expertise in IVIG use were invited to participate in a task force to address the shortage and ensure adequate supply for emergent indications. A tier system of IVIG indications was established according to the severity of diagnosis, urgency of indication, and quality of supporting evidence. Based on inventory, indications in selected tiers were auto-approved. Orders that could not be automatically approved were escalated for task force review. RESULTS: Overall, there were 342 distinct requests for IVIG during the study period (August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019). All Tier 1 indications were approved. Of all requests, only 2.6% (9) of requests were denied, none of which resulted in adverse effects based on retrospective chart review. Seven patients who regularly receive IVIG had possible adverse effects due to dose reduction or spacing of treatment; however, each complication was multifactorial and not attributed to the shortage or tier system implementation alone. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary task force and tier system to appropriately triage high-priority indications for limited pharmaceutical agents should be considered in health institutions faced with a drug shortage.

[Analysis of 9 cases of drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis].

Objective: To analyze the clinical features,treatment and prognosis of drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (DIHS-HLH). Methods: This was a retrospective case study. Clinical characteristics, laboratory results, treatment and prognosis of 9 patients diagnosed with DIHS-HLH in Beijing Children's hospital between January 2020 and December 2022 were summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the overall survival rate. Results: Among all 9 cases, there were 6 males and 3 females, with the age ranged from 0.8 to 3.1 years. All patients had fever, rash, hepatomegaly and multiple lymph node enlargement. Other manifestations included splenomegaly (4 cases), pulmonary imaging abnormalities (6 cases), central nervous system symptoms (3 cases), and watery diarrhea (3 cases). Most patients showed high levels of soluble-CD25 (8 cases), hepatic dysfunction (7 cases) and hyperferritinemia (7 cases). Other laboratory abnormalities included hemophagocytosis in bone marrow (5 cases), hypofibrinogenemia (3 cases) and hypertriglyceridemia (2 cases). Ascending levels of interleukin (IL) 5, IL-8 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) were detected in more than 6 patients. All patients received high dose intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroid and ruxolitinib, among which 4 patients were also treated with high dose methylprednisolone, 2 patients with etoposide and 2 patients with cyclosporin A. After following up for 0.2-38.6 months, 7 patients survived, and the 1-year overall survival rate was (78±14)%. Two patients who had no response to high dose immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone 2 mg/(kg·d) and ruxolitinib died. Watery diarrhea, increased levels of IL-5 and IL-8 and decreased IgM were more frequently in patients who did not survive. Conclusions: For children with fever, rash and a suspicious medication history, when complicated with hepatomegaly, impaired liver function and high levels of IL-5 and IL-8, DIHS-HLH should be considered. Once diagnosed with DIHS-HLH, suspicious drugs should be stopped immediately, and high dose intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroid and ruxolitinib could be used to control disease.

Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.

Current knowledge of TNF-α monoclonal antibody infliximab in treating Kawasaki disease: a comprehensive review.

Kawasaki disease (KD), an autoinflammatory disease primarily affecting young children, characterized by consisting of acute systemic vasculitis and coronary artery involvement in severe cases. Intravenous immunoglobulin gamma (IVIG) combined with aspirin therapy is the first-line regimen for the prevention of coronary aneurysms in the acute phase of KD. The etiology and pathogenesis of KD are unclear, but its incidence is increasing gradually, especially in the cases of IVIG-naïve KD and refractory KD. Conventional therapies for refractory KD have unsatisfactory results. At present, infliximab (IFX), a human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), has made great progress in the treatment of KD. This review revealed that IFX infusion (5 mg/kg) could effectively modulate fever, reduce inflammation, improve arthritis, diminish the number of plasma exchange, decrease hospitalizations, and prevent the progression of coronary artery lesions. The adverse effects of IFX administration included skin rash, arthritis, respiratory disease, infusion reaction, hepatomegaly, and vaccination-associated complications. But the incidence of these adverse effects is low. The clear optimal application protocol of the application of IFX for either initial combination therapy or salvage therapy in KD is still under investigation. In addition, there are no effective biomarkers to predict IFX resistance. Further multicenter trials with large sample size and long-term follow-up are still needed to validate the clinical efficacy and safety of IFX for IVIG-resistant KD or refractory KD.

Serum amyloid A as a biomarker for immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) resistance is of prime importance in Kawasaki disease (KD). In this study, we examined the value and mechanism of serum amyloid A (SAA) level in predicting IVIG resistance in patients with KD. METHODS: SAA levels were measured in 497 consecutive patients with KD before IVIG therapy in the training set. The patients were divided into two groups (IVIG-responsive and IVIG-resistant) according to the American Heart Association (AHA) definition of IVIG resistance. Demographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were also retrospectively analyzed and tabulated to predict IVIG resistance. The predictive value of SAA was validated on test sets of prospective data. Cytokine microarrays were analyzed from 4 patients with resistant to IVIG, 4 patients with responsive to IVIG and 4 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: During the training set, 409 patients with KD were enrolled, of whom 43 (10.5%) were resistant to initial IVIG treatment and 47 (11.49%) had coronary artery lesions (CALs). Serum levels of SAA were higher in the IVIG resistant group compared to the IVIG responsive group, (380.00 [204.40-547.25] vs 230.85 [105.40-490.00] mg/L; p = .008). The values of total bilirubin, C-reactive protein, neutrophils, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, interleukin-6(IL-6), and procalcitonin were significantly higher in the IVIG-resistant group than in the IVIG-responsive group (p < .05); however, the lymphocytes, platelets, serum sodium levels, and duration of fever before IVIG therapy were significantly lower (p < .05). There was no significant difference in SAA levels between patients with KD with and without CALs. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that SAA (p = .008), neutrophils (p < .001), total bilirubin (p = .001), platelet count (p = .004), and serum sodium level (p = .019) were independent factors influencing IVIG resistance. The optimal cutoff value of SAA for IVIG resistance prediction was 252.45 mg/L, with a corresponding clinical sensitivity of 69.8% and specificity of 54.4%. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) of combined detection with these five indicators was 0.800, clinical sensitivity was 69.8%, and specificity was 76.2%. In the prospective data, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SAA for identifying IVIG resistance KD were 77.8%,69.0%, and 70.0%, respectively. Compared with IVIG- responsive group and healthy children, the levels of IL-6 was upregulated significantly in IVIG-resistant group through cytokine microarrays. CONCLUSIONS: SAA may be a potential biomarker for predicting IVIG responsiveness to KD, Combined detection of SAA levels, total bilirubin, neutrophil count, platelet count, and serum sodium levels is superior to that of any other single indicator for predicting IVIG resistance in KD. And elevated SAA may accompany with IL-6 in KD patients, its use in clinical practice may be helpful for treatment management.

Plasmapheresis Versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients With Autoimmune Neuromuscular and Neuro-immunological Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Plasmapheresis (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are commonly used to treat autoimmune neuromuscular disorders, including myasthenia gravis, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and other autoimmune neurological disorders. The side effect profiles of these therapies vary, and concern has been raised regarding the safety of PLEX in the elderly population. In this study, we have examined the pattern of PLEX and IVIg use for autoimmune neurological disorders at a single facility and in a national database, focusing on the complications in elderly patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients at our institution receiving PLEX or IVIg for any autoimmune neuromuscular or neuro-immunological disease. Next, we analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database to confirm the trend in IVIg and PLEX use from 2012 to 2018 for a set of neuromuscular and neuro-immunological primary diagnoses. RESULTS: IVIg was overall favored over PLEX. The adverse effects were similar among elderly patients (age ≥65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) in our institution, even after adequate matching of patients based on age, sex, and medical history. We examined the National Inpatient Sample dataset and noted increasingly higher frequency of IVIg use, consistent with the findings from our institution or facility. CONCLUSIONS: Both PLEX and IVIg are safe therapeutic choices in adult patients with autoimmune neuromuscular disorders and other neuro-immunological diseases and can be safely administered in the appropriate clinical setting.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 16.5% (Cutaquig®) in Primary Immunodeficiency Disease: Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Patient Experience with Enhanced Infusion Regimens.

PURPOSE: To achieve reductions in infusion time, infusion sites, and frequency, a prospective, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) 16.5% (Cutaquig®, Octapharma) at enhanced infusion regimens. METHODS: Three separate cohorts received SCIG 16.5% evaluating volume, rate, and frequency: Cohort 1) volume assessment/site: up to a maximum 100 mL/site; Cohort 2) infusion flow rate/site: up to a maximum of 100 mL/hr/site or the maximum flow rate achievable by the tubing; Cohort 3) infusion frequency: every other week at twice the patient's weekly dose. RESULTS: For Cohort 1 (n = 15), the maximum realized volume per site was 108 mL/site, exceeding the currently labeled (US) maximum (up to 40 mL/site for adults). In Cohort 2 (n = 15), the maximum realized infusion flow rate was 67.5 mL/hr/site which is also higher than the labeled (US) maximum (up to 52 mL/hr/site). In Cohort 3 (n = 34), the mean total trough levels for every other week dosing demonstrated equivalency to weekly dosing (p value = 0.0017). All regimens were well tolerated. There were no serious bacterial infections (SBIs). Most patients had mild (23.4%) or moderate (56.3%) adverse events. The majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens and reported that switching to SCIG 16.5% was easy. CONCLUSIONS: SCIG 16.5% (Cutaquig®), infusions are efficacious, safe, and well tolerated with reduced infusion time, fewer infusion sites, and reduced frequency. Further, the majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens.

Iatrogenic ANA: An emerging source of expensive diagnostic confusion.

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) therapy has been shown to be useful in a multitude of disorders. IVIg is produced from pooled human plasma; therefore, autoantibodies found in the general population are also present in IVIg and transferred to those being transfused. This can prove a particular hazard for screening and diagnostic tests based on autoantibodies. We present a patient who was found to have a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer after multiple IVIg transfusions, resulting in diagnostic confusion and unnecessary workup. A 45-year-old gentleman was diagnosed with atypical CIDP, initiated on a course of IVIg, and sent for inpatient rehabilitation. However, recovery was complicated by multiple readmissions for recurrent weakness, and as part of the workup for other etiologies, an ANA was found to be positive. Sub-serologies and paraneoplastic autoantibody panel were negative. In the absence of clinical symptoms, we recommended continued monitoring and repeat ANA testing 6 months after the last dose of IVIg; as any drug needs 5 half-lives to be eliminated from the body. Clinicians should consider any recent IVIg treatments when evaluating the pre-test probability of detecting an underlying connective tissue disease with ANA screening. Indiscriminate ANA levels in patients recently given IVIg lead to unnecessary and expensive further testing and consultation.

Clinical use of polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins during intensive polychemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is seen in almost 30% of cases of cancer among children. Drop in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and immunosuppression during chemotherapy are causing the significant increase in the risk of other complications, which can lead to prolonged hospitalization, higher costs of therapy and increased mortality. METHODS: The analysis concerned 78 patients treated for ALL at the Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantology. The indications for the use of immunoglobulins, the regimen of administration, the dose and adverse reactions were analyzed. RESULTS: Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) were used in 66 (85%) of 78 patients. The standard risk group (SR) was represented by 10 (15%) patients, intermediate (IR) - 29 (44%), and high (HR) - 27 (41%). The most common were 1 and 2-day administrations - 60% and 28%, respectively, of transfusions. The spread of the IVIG doses used ranged from 43 mg to 882 mg/kg body weight. In the SR and IR groups, preparations were transfused at the reinduction stage, while in the HR-consolidation. Among the indications for IVIG, the most common was hypogammaglobulinemia-117 (42%), neutropenia-69 (25%) and infection-62 (22%). During the implementation of 279 patterns of immunoglobulin preparations, 8 (3%) post-transfusion reactions were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of ALL patients required immunoglobulin substitution during polychemotherapy. The supply of preparations is safe, however, there are no unambiguous guidelines regarding their dosage.

Infliximab as a second-line therapy for children with refractory Kawasaki disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Infliximab is a tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor that is used to treat children with refractory Kawasaki disease (KD). Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and impact of infliximab versus intravenous immunoglobulins on the incidence of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) and treatment resistance in children with refractory KD. METHODS: The Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinical trials registries were searched to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing infliximab as second-line therapy to a second dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in children with refractory KD, reported in abstract or full text, were included. Studies were selected and assessed for risk of bias by two reviewers. Data were extracted and pooled using conventional random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. RESULTS: A total of 199 participants from four RCTs were included. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for the incidence of treatment resistance in patients treated with infliximab was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.64). For incidence of CAAs RR was 1.20 (95% CI 0.54-2.63), the incidence of adverse effect "infusion reactions" RR was 0.48, (95% CI 0.12-1.92) and for "infections" RR was 0.55 (95% CI 0.27-1.12). Overall, the GRADE strength of evidence for the primary outcomes was low. Evidence on the duration of fever and inflammatory biomarkers was sparse, heterogeneous and inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that infliximab may reduce the incidence of treatment resistance in children with refractory KD. However, the limited strength of evidence warrants further research.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor combined with intravenous immunoglobulin and heparin for treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion: A two-centre, retrospective, cohort study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Immune disorder is a key trigger of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA); meanwhile, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is a fundamental therapeutic for multiple immune and inflammatory diseases. Hence, this real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of TNFi combined with intravenous immunoglobin (IVIG) and heparin therapy in RSA patients. METHODS: A total of 105 RSA patients who received TNFi+IVIG+Heparin (enoxaparin) (n = 48) or IVIG+Heparin (enoxaparin) (n = 57) were retrospectively included in this two-centre cohort study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The live birth rate of RSA patients in the TNFi+IVIG+heparin group was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.6%-85.9%). Besides, the live birth rate in the IVIG+heparin group was 52.6% (95% CI: 42.8%-62.4%). By comparison, the live birth rate was higher in the TNFi+IVIG+heparin group compared to the IVIG+heparin group (p = 0.033). After adjustment by the multivariate logistic regression model using the enter method, TNFi+IVIG+Heparin was also superior to IVIG+Heparin regarding increased live birth rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.941, p = 0.015). Moreover, TNFi+IVIG+Heparin (vs. IVIG+Heparin) also served as an independent factor for increased live birth rate (OR = 2.423, p = 0.035) by the forward stepwise method in the multivariate analysis. Gestational weeks at delivery (38.3 ± 1.3 vs. 37.7 ± 2.0 weeks, p = 0.155), newborn weight (3123.9 ± 332.1 vs. 3056.6 ± 287.4 g, p = 0.390), Apgar score of newborns (9.8 ± 0.5 vs. 9.7 ± 0.7, p = 0.271) were of no difference between TNFi+IVIG+Heparin and IVIG+Heparin groups. In terms of safety profile, the adverse events were of no difference between the TNFi+IVIG+Heparin and the IVIG+Heparin groups (all p > 0.05), either. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: TNFi combined with IVIG and heparin therapy improves the live birth rate but does not elevate the adverse events compared to IVIG and heparin therapy in RSA patients.

Lack of Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab for Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Following Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in comparison with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in renal transplant recipients diagnosed with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized analysis. The patients were randomized by therapy type (eg, eculizumab infusions or standard of care [SOC]: plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin). The patients (ie, eculizumab arm: 7 patients, SOC arm: 4 patients) were evaluated for the continued presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and C4d (staining on biopsy), as well as histologic evidence, using repeat renal biopsy after treatment. RESULTS: The allograft biopsies revealed that eculizumab did not prevent the progression to transplant glomerulopathy. Only 2 patients in the SOC arm experienced rejection reversal, and no graft losses occurred in either group. After AMR treatment, the DSA titers generally decreased compared to titers taken at the time of AMR diagnosis. There were no serious adverse effects in the eculizumab arm. CONCLUSIONS: Eculizumab alone cannot treat AMR effectively and does not prevent acute AMR from progressing to chronic AMR or transplant glomerulopathy. However, it should be considered as a potential alternative therapy because it may be associated with decreased DSA levels.

Long-Term Outcomes after Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), or thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), is a rare but serious complication of adenovirus-based vaccines against severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Observation of long-term outcomes is important to guide treatment of affected patients. This single-center consecutive cohort study included all patients diagnosed based on (1) vaccination 4 to 21 days before symptom onset, (2) signs or symptoms of venous or arterial thrombosis, (3) thrombocytopenia < 150/nL, (4) positive anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody, and (5) elevated D-Dimer > 4 times the upper limit of normal. Nine patients were enrolled. Acute management consisted of parenteral anticoagulants, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and/or eculizumab. Eculizumab was successfully used in two patients with recurrent thromboembolic events after IVIG. Direct oral anticoagulants were given after hospital discharge. Median follow-up duration was 300 days (range 153 to 380). All patients survived the acute phase of the disease and were discharged from hospital. One patient died from long-term neurological sequelae of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis 335 days after diagnosis. Eight out of nine patients were alive at last follow-up, and seven had fully recovered. Anti-PF4 antibodies remained detectable for at least 12 weeks after diagnosis, and D-Dimer remained elevated in some patients despite oral anticoagulation. No recurrent thromboembolic events, other signs of VITT relapse, or bleeding complications occurred after discharge. In conclusion, VITT appears to be a highly prothrombotic condition. IVIG is not always successful, and eculizumab may be considered a rescue agent. Long-term management with direct oral anticoagulants appears to be safe and effective.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a new 10% normal human immunoglobulin for intravenous infusion, BT595, in children and adults with primary immunodeficiency disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a new, highly purified 10% IVIg (BT595, Yimmugo®) administered in children and adults with Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PID). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, uncontrolled, multicentre Phase III trial. Patients aged 2 to <76 years with PID were switched from their pre-trial IVIg replacement therapy to BT595. In all, 67 patients (49 adults, 18 children) received doses between 0.2 and 0.8 g/kg body weight for approximately 12 months at intervals of 3 or 4 weeks. Dosing and dosing intervals were based on each patient's pre-trial infusion schedule. The primary end point was the rate of acute serious bacterial infections (SBIs); secondary efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The primary efficacy end point was met, and the unadjusted SBI rate was 0.01 per subject-year (adjusted SBI rate 0.015 per subject-year, with an upper limit of the one-sided 99% confidence interval of 0.151). A single adult patient experienced one event classified as an SBI. All secondary end points, including those related to infections, supported the efficacy. Infusion rates were increased up to 8 ml/kg/h. Overall, 8% of infusions were associated with ≥1 infusional adverse event (AE) (start during or within 72 h post-infusion), comprising mainly headache (2.4%), fatigue (0.9%) and nausea (0.5%). There were no infusional AEs at infusion rates of >4.0 ml/kg/h, and only one patient required a single premedication. The observed patterns, severity and frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events are consistent with the established safety profile for IVIgs and did not show clinically relevant differences between all age groups. CONCLUSION: BT595 is effective, safe and well tolerated for treating patients with PID.

The effect of intravenous immunoglobulins on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Severe-to-critical COVID-19 has been associated with exaggerated immune responses, and anti-inflammatory agents including corticosteroid and interleukin-6 antagonist have been repurposed as the treatment modality against severe SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 was controversial. METHODS: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effectiveness of IVIG in patients with COVID-19. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs that compared the clinical efficacy of IVIG with standard of care or placebo in the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included. RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 472 patients were included. Patients who received IVIG had a similar mortality rate to the controls (25.3% vs 27.0%, odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-1.31). Compared with the control group, the study group demonstrated a similar incidence of receiving mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.11), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.22-1.53), length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD], -1.81 days; 95% CI, -8.42 to 4.81) and ICU stay (MD, -0.61 days; 95% CI, -2.80 to 1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of IVIG in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 does not improve clinical outcomes.

IVIg-exposure and thromboembolic event risk: findings from the UK Biobank.

BACKGROUND: Arterial and venous thromboembolic events (TEEs) have been associated with intravenous Ig use, but the risk has been poorly quantified. We aimed to calculate the risk of TEEs associated with exposure to intravenous Ig. METHODS: We included participants from UK Biobank recruited over 3 years, data extracted September 2020.The study endpoints were incidence of myocardial infarction, other acute ischaemic heart disease, stroke, pulmonary embolism and other venous embolism and thrombosis.Predictors included known TEE risk factors: age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, cancer and past history of TEE. Intravenous Ig and six other predictors were added in the sensitivity analysis.Information from participants was collected prospectively, while data from linked resources, including death, cancer, hospital admissions and primary care records were collected retrospectively and prospectively.  FINDINGS: 14 794 of 502 492 individuals had an incident TEE during the study period. The rate of incident events was threefold higher in those with prior history of TEE (8 .7%) than those without previous history of TEE (3.0%).In the prior TEE category, intravenous Ig exposure was independently associated with increased risk of incident TEE (OR=3.69 (95% CI 1.15 to 11.92), p=0.03) on multivariate analysis. The number needed to harm by exposure to intravenous Ig in those with a history of TEE was 5.8 (95% CI 2.3 to 88.3).Intravenous Ig exposure did not increase risk of TEE in those with no previous history of TEE. INTERPRETATION: Intravenous Ig is associated with increased risk of further TEE in individuals with prior history of an event with one further TEE for every six people exposed. In practice, this will influence how clinicians consent for and manage overall TEE risk on intravenous Ig exposure.

A novel flow cytometry procoagulant assay for diagnosis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe prothrombotic complication of adenoviral vaccines, including the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Vaxzevria) vaccine. The putative mechanism involves formation of pathological anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that activate platelets via the low-affinity immunoglobulin G receptor FcγRIIa to drive thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Functional assays are important for VITT diagnosis, as not all detectable anti-PF4 antibodies are pathogenic, and immunoassays have varying sensitivity. Combination of ligand binding of G protein-coupled receptors (protease-activated receptor-1) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-linked receptors (FcγRIIa) synergistically induce procoagulant platelet formation, which supports thrombin generation. Here, we describe a flow cytometry-based procoagulant platelet assay using cell death marker GSAO and P-selectin to diagnose VITT by exposing donor whole blood to patient plasma in the presence of a protease-activated receptor-1 agonist. Consecutive patients triaged for confirmatory functional VITT testing after screening using PF4/heparin ELISA were evaluated. In a development cohort of 47 patients with suspected VITT, plasma from ELISA-positive patients (n = 23), but not healthy donors (n = 32) or individuals exposed to the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine without VITT (n = 24), significantly increased the procoagulant platelet response. In a validation cohort of 99 VITT patients identified according to clinicopathologic adjudication, procoagulant flow cytometry identified 93% of VITT cases, including ELISA-negative and serotonin release assay-negative patients. The in vitro effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and fondaparinux trended with the clinical response seen in patients. Induction of FcγRIIa-dependent procoagulant response by patient plasma, suppressible by heparin and IVIg, is highly indicative of VITT, resulting in a sensitive and specific assay that has been adopted as part of a national diagnostic algorithm to identify vaccinated patients with platelet-activating antibodies.

The Triple HIT: Perioperative Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Using Plasma Exchange, Intravenous Immunoglobulin, and Protamine Infusion for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication in patients exposed to heparin, leading to thrombocytopenia and, potentially, thrombosis. This disorder is challenging in cardiac surgery when anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass is required. Herein a patient with HIT who had active thrombosis and successfully underwent urgent left ventricular assist device implantation managed with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and protamine infusion is described. These therapies reduce the immune response to heparin and minimize thrombosis when heparin reexposure is planned. These approaches to perioperative management of HIT represent an attractive alternative to the use of non-heparin anticoagulants in the cardiac and vascular surgical population.

Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous immunoglobulin versus intravenous methylprednisolone treatment in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) versus IVIg plus IVMP (IPI) as initial therapy in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. METHODS: This was a multicenter study of prospectively identified NMDAR encephalitis individuals who presented from October 2011 to August 2020 to the study hospitals of western China, with a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Prespecified candidate variables were the prescriptions of IVIg, IVMP or IPI. Propensity score matching was also performed to control potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 347 NMDAR encephalitis patients were finally analyzed in this study. After TriMatch for NMDAR encephalitis, 37 triplets were generated. Compared to IVIg or IVMP, the administration of IPI exhibited a significant benefit of a higher response rate (86.5% vs. 55.6% vs. 68.7%, pcorr < 0.01), improved modified Rankin Scale score at 3, 6 and 12 months (pcorr < 0.05), and reduced further recurrence rate (10 of 37 [27.0%] vs. 9 of 37 [24.3%] vs. 2 of 37 [5.4%]; p log rank = 0.01). There was no association between treatment superiority and patient sex or the presence of tumors (p ≥ 0.05). Patients treated with IVMP had a significantly higher number of adverse events, but 99% of adverse events were mild to moderate and did not lead to a change in treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with NMDAR encephalitis, adequate response, favorable outcome and less recurrence were each more likely to occur in individuals treated with a combined immunotherapy than in monotherapy individuals.